<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Amazon Web Services</title>
	<atom:link href="http://drewsbox.com/web-2-0-journal/amazon-web-services/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://drewsbox.com/web-2-0-journal/amazon-web-services</link>
	<description>The online home of Andrew &#34;Fenix&#34; Hammond, enthusiast of everything web. Check out my blog, find some inspiration, drop me an email, or join the discussion by leaving comments. Stay updated by subscribing to the RSS feed. Thanks for dropping by!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 06:34:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Dahl</title>
		<link>http://drewsbox.com/web-2-0-journal/amazon-web-services/comment-page-1#comment-972</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Dahl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 06:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.drewsbox.com/?p=184#comment-972</guid>
		<description>Amazon&#039;s Web Services are definitely pretty bitch&#039;n.  I actually use Rackspace&#039;s File Cloud which offers basically the same thing (nearly identical backend, I&#039;m sure).

Also, just a nice mention for anyone considering Amazon&#039;s Cloud service.  Check out Rackspace&#039;s Server Cloud.  At the moment, the only things I&#039;ve noticed that were missing was the ability to view/change DNS entries via the API and adding text records to the DNS; however, they tell me that&#039;s coming soon.  The other big difference is that with Amazon&#039;s service, you have to save the image each time you restart (thus, you need to pay extra for attached storage if you want to use a database and not lose data).  Rackspace&#039;s are all stateless, so they&#039;re basically like a VPS, but slightly neater.

But, back to the article =P  If you only need hosted files and the like, such as this article mainly focuses on, Amazon&#039;s S3 or Rackspace&#039;s File Cloud are great choices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazon&#8217;s Web Services are definitely pretty bitch&#8217;n.  I actually use Rackspace&#8217;s File Cloud which offers basically the same thing (nearly identical backend, I&#8217;m sure).</p>
<p>Also, just a nice mention for anyone considering Amazon&#8217;s Cloud service.  Check out Rackspace&#8217;s Server Cloud.  At the moment, the only things I&#8217;ve noticed that were missing was the ability to view/change DNS entries via the API and adding text records to the DNS; however, they tell me that&#8217;s coming soon.  The other big difference is that with Amazon&#8217;s service, you have to save the image each time you restart (thus, you need to pay extra for attached storage if you want to use a database and not lose data).  Rackspace&#8217;s are all stateless, so they&#8217;re basically like a VPS, but slightly neater.</p>
<p>But, back to the article =P  If you only need hosted files and the like, such as this article mainly focuses on, Amazon&#8217;s S3 or Rackspace&#8217;s File Cloud are great choices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
